Deconstructive Interpretation As A Jihad Form Of Constitutional Judge Towards Legislative Corruption

Marwiyah, Siti; Wahid, Abdul; Amiq, Bachrul; Borman, M. Syahrul

dc.contributor.author	Marwiyah, Siti
dc.contributor.author	Wahid, Abdul
dc.contributor.author	Amiq, Bachrul
dc.contributor.author	Borman, M. Syahrul
dc.date.accessioned	2021-10-26T01:52:54Z
dc.date.available	2021-10-26T01:52:54Z
dc.date.issued	2020-07-08
dc.identifier.issn	2394-5125
dc.identifier.uri	http://www.jcreview.com/index.php?mno=133925
dc.identifier.uri	http://repository.unisma.ac.id/handle/123456789/2160
dc.description	[ARCHIVES] Copyright Article From : JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Deconstructive interpretation is an interpretation conducted by a constitutional judge when providing assessment or consideration towards the application of the judicial review of a law requested by an applicant to the Constitutional Court. This judge's interpretation becomes a jihad model of a constitutional judge to correct the legislation product that suspected to be corruptively produced and implemented. This board of legislation or board of lawmakers has the authority to design, discuss, and decides a law. Polticians' power should able to finish the discussion of the law. However, due to the behaviour of politicians, many laws are failed to pass.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REVIEWS;VOL 7, ISSUE 12, 2020
dc.subject	Deconstructive	en_US
dc.subject	Corruption	en_US
dc.subject	Jihat	en_US
dc.title	Deconstructive Interpretation As A Jihad Form Of Constitutional Judge Towards Legislative Corruption	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US