Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmrozi, Fiky
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T01:55:20Z
dc.date.available2020-11-13T01:55:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.unisma.ac.id/handle/123456789/275
dc.description.abstractEfforts to improve the quality of human resources in companies need to be done well, directed, and planned. One of the companies that made efforts to improve the human resources of its employees is PT Ekajaya Motor Malang, in this case the company provides an opportunity for employees to take part in work education and training, so that the company can compete healthily with other companies, bearing in mind the tight competition between companies . After the work education and training is finished, the company and the employee enter into a work agreement, provided that employees may not resign before the employment agreement period ends. But in general, every work agreement often arises with problems for one of the parties who did not implement the provisions stated in the contents of the agreement. As is the case at PT Ekajaya Motor Malang, in this case the employee commits a violation by resigning before the employment contract agreement period expires, which can be categorized as the employee has defaulted on the employment agreement. The problems that arise are 1.) how the settlement efforts made by PT Ekajaya Motor Malang of employees who default on the work agreement. 2.) what are the legal consequences for employees who have defaulted on the work agreement. This research is an empirical juridical research, which is descriptive in nature, the type of data used in this study are secondary data and primary data. The research location is PT Ekajaya Motor Malang which is located on Jl. Raya Belung RT.01 RW.02, Poncokusumo, Malang Regency. Data collection techniques are using interview techniques, observation, and literature study. The collected data is then processed and analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. From the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded that, 1.) the company is warning employees who have defaulted by inviting relevant parties to discuss with the company in order to resolve the problem so that resigning by means of consultation is not found a way out and employees are still found insisted on resigning from the company. Then the company will approve it, it's just that the salary deducted by 25% (twenty-five percent) after the first month will become the company's property. 2.) the company PT Ekajaya Motor Malang never brought this problem before the court because in addition to requiring administrative costs to the court of course there will be additional costs during the trial process, which is less effective in resolving this problem. The company prefers to resolve the family / mediation process. Keywords: Wanprestatie, Employment Contract Agreement.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Islam Malangen_US
dc.subjectWanprestasien_US
dc.subjectPerjanjian Kontrak Kerjaen_US
dc.titleWanprestasi Karyawan dalam Perjanjian Kontrak Kerja berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan (Studi Kasus PT Ekajaya Motor Malang)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record