Deconstructive Interpretation As A Jihad Form Of Constitutional Judge Towards Legislative Corruption

Abstract

Deconstructive interpretation is an interpretation conducted by a constitutional judge when providing assessment or consideration towards the application of the judicial review of a law requested by an applicant to the Constitutional Court. This judge's interpretation becomes a jihad model of a constitutional judge to correct the legislation product that suspected to be corruptively produced and implemented. This board of legislation or board of lawmakers has the authority to design, discuss, and decides a law. Polticians' power should able to finish the discussion of the law. However, due to the behaviour of politicians, many laws are failed to pass.