dc.description.abstract | The integration of online and offline learning methods in English
education has sparked diverse perspectives regarding its effectiveness.
Understanding student perceptions and preferences is critical to optimizing
pedagogical approaches. This study aims to compare students' experiences in
online and offline English learning environments at Malang Islamic University,
focusing on their views regarding accessibility, interaction, engagement, and
learning outcomes.
A qualitative approach was used in this research, which involved in-depth
interviews and observations of five students who were selected based on specific
criteria. The participants included three female and two male master's-level
students from diverse educational backgrounds within the English Education
program. They were chosen to ensure a balanced representation of genders and a
range of technological proficiencies and geographical locations relative to the
campus. This purposive sampling method aimed to capture a comprehensive
understanding of their experiences with online and offline learning methods.
The study revealed that while online learning offers flexibility and
convenience, technical obstacles and lack of face-to-face interaction pose
significant challenges. Conversely, offline learning provides live interaction,
immediate feedback, and a structured environment, fostering discipline and
engagement. Both methods have unique advantages and challenges, influencing
students' experiences based on individual preferences and technology proficiency.
These findings emphasize the importance of balancing flexibility with meaningful
engagement in both online and offline learning environments.
This study compares students' experiences in online and offline English
learning at Universitas Islam Malang, focusing on accessibility, interaction,
engagement, and learning outcomes. Online learning offers flexibility but faces
technical challenges and lacks face-to-face interaction. Offline learning provides
immediate feedback and a structured environment but lacks flexibility. The study
concludes that both methods have unique advantages and limitations. A blended
learning approach, combining the strengths of both, is recommended to enhance
flexibility, engagement, and accessibility, supported by technical training for
students and teachers | en_US |